Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Terhadap Toleransi Risiko Usaha Pedagang Sayur Di Pasar Tradisional

Muh. Farrel Prayoga Ardiansyah, Didi Rukmana, A. Amrullah

Abstract


Vegetable traders in traditional market facing several risks when running their business such as physical risk of vegetable that easily damaged, price changes and unstable market condition. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of socioeconomic factors such as age (X1), education (X2), number of dependent (X3), business experience (X4) and business income (X5) on vegetable trader’s business risk tolerance at Pa’baeng-baeng traditional market in Makassar City (Y). There are 30 vegetable traders as respondents. The data was gathered by questionnaires. The Risk tolerance variable is measured based on the respondent’s answer to the risk tolerance statement on the questionnaire using the likert scale measurement and transformed using Method of Successive Interval Tools. Data analyzed using multiple linear regression with hypothesis testing using the coefficient of determination (R2), F-Test (simultaneous) and t-Test (partial). Some tests are needed before carrying out the multiple linear regression analysis including validity and reliability test and also the classical assumption test including normality, multicollinearity and Homoscedasticity test. The results showing: (a) coefficient of determination (R2) shows that 40,9% vegetable trader’s risk tolerance is explained by socioeconomic factors while the remaining is explained by other variables that are not tested, (b) the F-Test analysis shows that all variables of socioeconomic factors significantly affect the vegetable trader’s risk tolerance, (c) t-Test analysis shows that education (X2) and business experience (X4) variables are significantly affect the vegetable trader’s risk tolerance while age (X1), number of dependent (X3) and business income (X3) are not significantly affect.

 

Pedagang sayur di pasar tradisional menghadapi beberapa risiko saat menjalankan usahanya seperti risiko fisik sayuran yang mudah rusak, harga yang berubah-ubah dan kondisi pasar yang tidak menentu. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui pengaruh faktor sosial ekonomi pedagang yang meliputi usia (X1), pendidikan (X2), jumlah tanggungan (X3), lama usaha (X4) dan pendapatan usaha (X5) terhadap toleransi risiko usaha pedagang sayur di pasar tradisional Pa’baeng-baeng di Kota Makassar (Y). Jumlah responden pada penelitian ini adalah 30 orang pedagang sayur. Metode pengumpulan data yaitu menggunakan kuesioner. Variabel toleransi risiko diukur berdasarkan jawaban responden terhadap pernyataan toleransi risiko dengan menggunakan pengukuran skala likert kemudian dilakukan transformasi data menggunakan Method of Successive Interval Tools. Analisis data menggunakan regresi linear berganda dengan pengujian hipotesis menggunakan koefisien determinasi (R2), uji F (serempak) dan uji t (parsial). Sebelum dilakukan analisis regresi linear berganda terlebih dahulu dilakukan uji validitas dan reliabilitas serta uji asumsi klasik yang meliputi uji normalitas, multikolinearitas dan heteroskedastisitas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan; (a) analisis koefisien determinasi (R2) menunjukkan bahwa 40,9% toleransi risiko pedagang sayur di pasar tradisional dapat dijelaskan oleh variabel faktor sosial ekonomi sedangkan sisanya dijelaskan variabel lain yang tidak diteliti, (b) uji F (serempak) menunjukkan bahwa semua variabel faktor sosial ekonomi secara serempak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap toleransi risiko pedagang sayur, (c) uji t (parsial) menunjukkan bahwa variabel pendidikan (X2) dan lama usaha (X4) berpengaruh signifikan terhadap toleransi risiko pedagang sayur sedangkan usia (X1), jumlah tanggungan (X3) dan pendapatan usaha (X3) tidak berpengaruh signifikan.


Keywords


pedagang sayur; pasar tradisional; faktor sosial ekonomi; toleransi risiko

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, G. N., Warokka, A., & Puji Lestari, I. (2020). Financial Risk Tolerance Analysis of Indonesian Retail Investors. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(4), 852–875. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8484

Anbar, A., & Eker, M. (2019). The Effect of Sociodemographic Variables and Love of Money on Financial Risk Tolerance of Bankers. Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(4), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2019.206

As Sajjad, M. B., Kalista, S. D., Zidan, M., & Christian, J. (2020). Analisis Manajemen Risiko Bisnis (Studi pada Cuanki Asoy Jember). Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Jember, 18(1), 51–61.

Barry, C., & Halfmann, K. (2016). The Effect of Mindset on Decision-Making. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 6(1), 49–74. www.JISS.org,

Basuki. (2021). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. CV. Media Sains Indonesia.

Chattopadhyay, S., & Dasgupta, R. (2015). Demographic and Socioeconomic Impact on Risk Attitudes of the Indian Investors - An Empirical Study. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5(4), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr/2015.5.4/102.4.601.623

Cornelis, Y., & Linawati, N. (2015). Toleransi Risiko Pada Pasangan Yang Sudah Menikah. Finesta, 3(2), 39–43.

Darma, B. (2021). Statistika Penelitian Menggunakan SPSS (Uji Validitas, Uji Reliabilitas, Regresi Linier Sederhana, Regresi Linier Berganda, Uji t, Uji F, R2). Guepedia.

Duli, N. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif : Beberapa Konsep Dasar Untuk Penulisan Skripsi & Analisis Data Dengan SPSS. Deepublish.

Fahmi, I. (2016). Manajemen Risiko Teori, Kasus, dan Solusi. Alfabeta.

Fisher, P., & Yao, R. (2017). Gender Differences in Financial Risk Tolerance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 191–202. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3028071Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3028071Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3028071

Gupta, N., Ahirwal, M. K., & Atulkar, M. (2022). Simulation and Modeling of Human Decision-Making Process Through Reinforcement Learning Based Computational Model Involving Past Experiences. Decision Science Letters, 11(4), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.5267/dsl.2022.9.001

Iskandar, B. S., Iskandar, J., Irawan, B., & Partasasmita, R. (2018). Traditional Markets and Diversity of Edible Plant Trading: Case Study in Ujung Berung, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 19(2), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190211

Jenar, M., Sutopo, W., & Yuniaristanto. (2015). Pengembangan Model Game Theory Pada Skema Persediaan Penyangga Untuk Menjamin Ketersediaan Dan Kestabilan Harga Komoditas Gula Pasir. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 10(2), 97–102.

Juliandi, A., Irfan, Manurung, S., & Satriawan, B. (2016). Mengolah Data Penelitian Bisnis Dengan SPSS. Lembaga Penelitian Dan Penulisan Ilmiah Aqli.

Koekemoer, Z. (2018). The Influence of Demographic Factor on Risk Tolerance For South African Investors. 39th International Academic Conference. https://doi.org/10.20472/iac.2018.039.024

Koekemoer, Z. (2019). The Influence of The Level of Education on Investors Risk Tolerance Level. 12th Economics & Finance Conference, Dubrovnik. https://doi.org/10.20472/efc.2019.012.012

Lestari, I. P. (2021). Effect of Sociodemographic Factors and Multidimensional of Risk Toward Financial Risk Tolerance and Risk Tolerance Assessment Using Data Envelopment Analysis of Indonesian Investors. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 04(04), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.37502/ijsmr.2021.4407

Maritz, L., & Oberholzer, M. (2019). The Association Between South African Investors’ Financial Risk Tolerance and Demographic Variables. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v12i1.469

Nadia, S., Umar, M., & Juardi. (2022). Dampak Jumlah Anggota Keluarga dan Pendidikan Terhadap Pola Konsumsi Rumah Tangga Miskin. Bulletin of Economics (BEST), 2(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.24252/best.30522

Nosita, F., Pirzada, K., Lestari, T., & Cahyono, R. (2020). Impact of Demographic Factors on Risk Tolerance. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(4), 1327–1336. https://doi.org/10.9770/JSSI.2020.9.4(18)

Nurdin, I., & Hartati, S. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Media Sahabat Cendekia.

Retnawati, H. (2017). Pengantar Analisis Regresi dan Korelasi. Makalah disajikan pada kegiatan Workshop Teknik Analisis Data Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis IAIN Batusangkar di Rocky Hotel Bukittinggi, 25 Juli 2017.

Riyanto, S., & Hatmawan, A. A. (2020). Metode Riset Penelitian Kuantitatif Penelitian Di Bidang Manajemen, Teknik, Pendidikan Dan Eksperimen. Deepublish.

Santoso, S. (2016). Statistik Parametrik. Konsep dan Aplikasi Dengan SPSS. Elex Media Komputindo.

Shah, N. H., Aman, Q., & Khan, M. A. (2018). Risk Tolerance Profile of Business Students in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Tourism, 04(1), 147–157.

Sinaga, R., & Purba, M. R. (2020). Pengaruh Pandemi Virus Corona (Covid-19) Terhadap Pendapatan Pedagang Sayur dan Buah di Pasar Tradisional “Pajak Pagi Pasa V” Padang Bulan. Regionomic, 2(2), 37–48.

Spiegel, T. (2017). Influences of Personal Experience in Decision-Making. In Z. Nedelko & M. Brzozowski (Eds.), Exploring the Influence of Personal Values and Cultures in the Workplace (pp. 76–97). IGI Global.

Sudaryana, B., & Agusiady, H. R. R. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Deepublish.

Sudaryono. (2021). Statistik I: Statistik Deskriptif untuk Penelitian. Penerbit ANDI.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta.

Sujarweni, V. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis dan Ekonomi. PT. Pustaka Baru Press.

Sulaiman, E. K. (2012). An Empirical Analysis of Financial Risk Tolerance and Demographic Features of Individual Investors. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00070-6

Sulili, A., Summase, I., Rukmana, D., Diansari, P., Arwinia, P. C., Indrastuti, & Muhardi. (2021). Production Risk and Income Risk Analysis of Rice Farming. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 681(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/681/1/012102

Sushila, Limje, S., & Sori, S. K. (2020). Factors Affecting Risk Taking Behavior of Farmers: A study in Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8(4), 254–256. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4d.10018




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2024.008.01.17

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.